Skip to main content

The Banana Slicer Reviews and White Fragility in the Workplace "HR video"

This video is meant to be a parody educational video that you would see in some sort of HR training.
Also, here is the link to the best product in information superhighway history: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0047E0EII?pf_rd_p=183f5289-9dc0-416f-942e-e8f213ef368b&pf_rd_r=G3CY0DSNSXV1G0HWM6X9

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Acts of citizen[ship] sociolinguistics

In Acts of Citizenship, professor Isen discusses how 'citizenship' has been studied in terms of 'status', where ideas of legality, boundaries, rights and obligations are the focus of study, and 'habitus' which are the "ways of thought and conduct that are internalized over a relatively long period of time" (p. 15). Instead of these two ways of studying 'citizenship,' he proposes a new perspective that focuses on "acts," meaning "the moments when subjects constitute themselves as citizens" (p.18).  These acts seem to be characterized by breaking with habitus and creating ruptures like the Montgomery Bus Boycott and Marion Wallace Dunlop's hunger strike did. Additionally, acts of citizenship seem to be oriented towards justice and involve acting and reacting with others (p. 39).    In Acts of Citizen Sociolinguistics, professor Rhymes explains that citizens sociolinguistics acts are ruptures that ma...

Stranger than Fiction: On the Ethics of Cultural Artifacts and Cross-Talk

In my blog post last week, I used the debates surrounding the song “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” to highlight a focal question of mine: How do we responsibly study and address difficult issues embedded in cultural artifacts, especially those that still wield sociocultural influence today? For the purpose of this post, I wish to consider Goffman’s On the Run both as a work of research and as a cultural artifact as well. One major problem I have perceived is that nobody can be fully knowledgeable in everything culture and society, but we all have to navigate complex sociocultural situations and make decisions and judgements every day. Different individuals possess different biographies, come from different perspectives, care about different artifacts and within them, different aspects, and therefore reach different interpretations and end up debating at complete cross-purposes. And thus, wherever there is fanfare, controversy, or some other point of interest, there is a very common ...